I don't understand people on either end of the spectrum getting angry with individuals "on the same team" who go on "unfriendly media". Is the point to persuade those with whom one differs, or not? If one limits oneself to talking only to those who are already in agreement, what is gained?
I don't understand people on either end of the spectrum getting angry with individuals "on the same team" who go on "unfriendly media". Is the point to persuade those with whom one differs, or not? If one limits oneself to talking only to those who are already in agreement, what is gained?
Yeah it doesn't make any sense to me either.