6 Comments
User's avatar
Jennie Corsi's avatar

It’s weird, isn’t it, getting the government involved in such a trivial matter? They have to pretend it’s a human rights issue, since libel doesn’t apply, because he is technically a he?

Yrmom's avatar
Apr 1Edited

It seems like others think you’re a prude now if you don’t like or want to do anal, or having missionary sex is for beginners- ridiculous. I’ve been talking about the obsession with anal for awhile now thank God it wasn’t a thing in the 90s. Also I did do it (on hard drugs) and am still traumatized over it. For gay men though it is obvious why they do it I have no shade to throw there, but the pressure for women to be ok with it is horrible.

Gilgamech's avatar

Was there with you at the beginning with Yaniv, Meghan. I am forever grateful to you for busting the anal myth.

Claire Tremblay's avatar

The chill on free speech is literally terrifying. Try living in Ottawa where you are surrounded by all of this. I can’t speak freely in restaurants about my concerns with friends in cafes and we use code such to convey ideas that are let’s say unfavourable like men are men and women are women. It’s insane that life has come to this. I even feel vulnerable stating this on Substack.

Reggie Stratocaster's avatar

Canadian and Provincial Human Rights Commissions are enabling the reversal of roles between perceived victims, who may experience hurt feelings, and offenders, who may be labeled as bullies for expressing offensive sentiments.

Gilgamech's avatar

“core tenet” not “core tenant”. But I give up.