Discussion about this post

User's avatar
miles.mcstylez's avatar

"But the right hasn’t rejected me on account of my position on women’s reproductive sovereignty and abortion"

I overall agree with you, but I'll point out that Tomi Lahren got canceled pretty hard by the right when she came out as pro-choice on Fox https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/business/media/tomi-lahren-lawsuit-glenn-beck-blaze.html

FWIW, I see nothing wrong with an alliance-of-convenience with right-wing men (I'll include Matt Walsh in there). Obviously feminists won't have much common ground with social conservatives outside of gender critical topics, but agreeing with every single one of a person's beliefs shouldn't be a prerequisite to working with them on shared issues. Julie's concern that diabolical genius right-wingers will exploit the poor naive feminists, or that going on Fox will mean those women have been suckered into working for the patriarchy, seems ironically paternalistic.

Plus, her purity politics play right into classic 'divide and conquer' tactics from the trans left, which makes it all the easier for them to enact their agenda.

Expand full comment
Marian's avatar

I’m so enjoying this series. You both make excellent points, and I find myself ping-ponging back and forth with each letter. Much thanks to you and Julie for doing this.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts