4 Comments
Jan 30Liked by Meghan Murphy

I take some issue with Ms. Overgard on the cause of the increase in C-sections that occurred in the 1980s. I've been practicing law for 40 years. Thirty-eight of those years have been devoted to defending the medical profession in malpractice cases. The threat of lawsuits, alleging failure to do a c-section when there are signs of fetal distress or when there are complications in the delivery, has impacted the c-section rate. If you're an OB with $1,000,000 in insurance coverage and you know that a bad outcome will result in a judgment several times your insurance limits, you'll be more inclined to proceed to c-section. Of course, this isn't the only reason. However, I don't think it's fair to discuss the c-section rate without also discussing the impact of malpractice liability for allegedly failing to do a timely c-section.

Again, Meghan, thanks for bring us an interesting interviewee and a stimulating discussion.

Expand full comment
Jan 28Liked by Meghan Murphy

So glad you’re having these conversations! Such an important topic that I feel like gets looked over especially in radical feminist spaces

Expand full comment
Jan 30Liked by Meghan Murphy

LOVED this interview. I gave natural birth to my children in the 80s using the Bradley method which is based on low anxiety -- birth is natural, animals do it, you can do it. I breast fed my kids for at least a year and appreciated Le Leche League support. I'm APPAULED with what is happening to the birth process and the betrayal of WOMEN by Le Leche League. Grrrrrr.

Expand full comment
Jan 29Liked by Meghan Murphy

Very informative. I learned a lot.

Expand full comment